Dear and excellent friend,

I am Manuel Herranz, president of the transparent and non-profit NGO, Human Unity Movement, HUM, and I addressing you requesting your support for the most ambitious and hopeful project.

According to our understanding, we are in a position to make a decisive change towards a human world, where people move from discord and competition (to death) to a world of harmony and cooperation. A change made possible only in our time.


Indeed, one of the most relevant circumstances of our present is globalization, a crucial human condition already dreamed by many wise and / or independent thinkers.

They became aware that discord, war, and human misery is due to exclusive or partial decision taking.

Exclusive or partial decision-taking necessarily leads to contradiction and confrontation among the parts and when the world was unconnected and unknown there was no way out of it because the alternative to partiality and exclusion is universality and inclusion and there is no an intermediate point.

These same thinkers knew that peace – which is the common cause – depends on inclusive decision-making because the logical consequence of inclusive decision-making is the end of entrepreneurship for harming -which would be as absurd as harming oneself.

With inclusive decision taking the aim of harming each other is fully replaced by the cooperation of all for common benefit.

Once we eliminate the purpose of harming, which obviously needs to be hidden or disguised in front of the others, we will be able to use common sense with transparency and without discrimination for the management of our relationships based on common objectives of cooperation.


In order to launch inclusive decision-making, we are convening a World Congress in Fall of 2020 to be broadcast live and open to everyone in the world. We propose to organize it into 6 working groups: Development, Security, Technologies (in turn divided into Food, Health, Environment, Energy, Mobility and Infrastructure), Women and Communication.

We will invite to participate in the Congress the best experts in those fields from around the world in order to produce consensus proposals for establishing and organizing coexistence and coordinate joint human common development. Then we will ask for support to those proposals from all people in the world regardless of their nationality and, therefore, those consensus proposals are of binding nature for the states


And now hereby we are requesting your support and cooperation for the convening and holding of the Congress because we expect your reflection and understanding of this proposal to be outside the framework of politics, nationalities. The point where we all can meet and forge a new way of dealing with ourselves, on the basis of common sense is not the ideologies, but the rationality we all share.

We all are human beings, we all have bodies, needs, and conditionings that we can understand by putting ourselves in the place of the other regardless of the country in which we were born or the ideological figurations we have been indoctrinated with.


An immediate and principal effect of the World Congress is the recycling of the world current investment in defense, meant against each other, for the benefit and well-being of humanity -this is the initial humanity asset because only human unity makes this investment for harming redundant and also, we, all the people, are the cause and guarantee of this investment becoming redundant, useless.

With human inclusive decision-making, we also eliminate the ‘strategic or confrontational need and priority’ of partial decision-taking, which subordinates and undermines people’s needs, desires and interests and causes exploitation, abuse, and discrimination. Inclusive decision-taking lets us all decide, plan and act only for humanity, people´s benefit.

That ‘strategic or confrontational need and priority’ of partial decision-taking also causes overexploitation of the planet and its natural resources, fast and uncontrollable environmental deterioration, fauna and flora extinction and prevents us from acting properly against climate change. Right decision making in response to these challenges is possible only if it is inclusive.


I thank you very much for your consideration and stay at your disposal so that no aspect remains without clarity and transparency and also looking forward to your cooperation in order to convene and organize the Congress.

Thank you very much for your attention

Very cordially

Manuel Herranz Martín
HUM – Human Unity Movement
C/ Puerto Serrano, 32 5ºA
28045 Madrid
Mobile:+34 656339490
Phone: +34 91 031 40 10

Read more


Dear friends,

We have received notification from the Madrid city council indicating that this year they cannot take on more (preparation of) activities, so we could talk about it next year. However, we hope that Barcelona city council will accept the proposal to hold the Unity Congress shortly and we can begin with its organization for celebrating it in the autumn of 2020.

We have started this week to send sponsorship proposals to various companies thanks to the great work of our Fundraising Manager, as well as we appreciate the progress of our Communication Group, volunteers from IE University. I invite you to follow their work on Instagramm, now @humanunityhum. They are also preparing a video promoting inclusive decision making, human unity.


The next two weeks will be dedicated to climate change, as we proposed an open workshop on “Strategies for control or mitigation of the effects of climate change and common decision-making possibilities” at IE University. Depending on the participation, the workshop could be divided into several groups that would segment the analysis to finally share conclusions and generate recommendations. We will have it in mind as a model for the Union Congress. We would also like to participate in the climate summit, have sent application, we understand that HUM’s proposal for inclusive decision making is the key factor for the summit to be successful.

Regarding climate change, our individual experience is limited to little more than, usually it is hotter in summer here in Madrid than in winter, but accumulated data as well as other scientific certainties well reported and popularized, have identified a process of global warming, largely or entirely caused by the human action which will lead to big damages we must prevent and avoid, or at least mitigate.

It is, therefore, a matter of common human security and this climate change summit should find measures agreed as wider as possible with this objective of prevention. The weight that each country gives to this matter is different and, for instance, it has been informed that the US refuses to any commitment about assuming measures agreed upon by that multilateral framework.

Even if global warming is a fact and its negative effects for the planet and humanity are highly probable, the priorities of the countries are diverse and it is difficult to reach effective agreements. The fact that the state´s approach to it is necessarily strategic can generate suspicion as about the possible benefit of some and detriment of others. For example, some countries may take advantage of those measures to establishing standards for homologating products and services worldwide as part of the fight against climate change resulting in increased exports of their own and undermining the sales/exports of other countries dependent on the first countries technologies. It does not mean that these countries are not rightly claiming their leadership on this innovation and accordingly reward as usual and proper in such cases, just it shows different interests. But, this is only one case to quote some of those possible suspicions or interest differences between countries, apart from the unequal impact of warming in different areas, etc.

And beyond that fact, although very committed voices have been raised for human action in the against climate change, it is shocking that there are no voices so committed in the struggle for human dignity crying out against abuse, oppression and war. What expectation can these voices have against climate change about unanimous response from humanity? It will necessarily be a political one, this is a particular yield, because while common measures are required to tackle the (potential) damage that climate change can cause to mankind, the damage that many people now (actually) suffer is not considered and, therefore, humanity (solidarity) seems not to include them or to discriminate them as part of humanity. That could be the case of Extinction Rebellion, we have addressed to cooperate, and have not replied. I could be that, in addition to fight against climate change, it does not go without a political gain (or political management).


Ecological awareness, the fight against climate change, fauna and flora diversity preservation and many other issues that concern humanity have very different readings in very different countries, despite being obviously matters of common human interest, for it makes an inclusive decision-making system increasingly urgent.

The enormous disagreement between ideologies, countries, etc. on information can make us doubt about the possibility of global governance, but communication is really no different from decision making. The clear awareness of this is what leads us to request Communication companies to be both a Working Group of the Union Congress and the Co-organizers of it. Actually, it is enough that our communication pretend to be inclusive, so that the decision-making process is also inclusive.

The current communications system is based on confrontation and war and, therefore, the objective of communication is the expansion of the domain of the publisher (actually the one who finances the publication) over the others. Any interpretation / communication about the facts, needless to say, is intended to claim a right (a past right is the fundament for present right) and also the assessment of those facts or data that manifest a trajectory, as is the case of warming, for each one will imply different effects in a way that each one will expose them or emphasize something to be used to imply something that favors their particularity; a right, a privilege, a primacy, etc.

In this context, it is surprising that we, those who are for inclusiveness –are you in?, are being able to go little by little spreading the proposal of human unity. This would be impossible without the existence of common sense because in the state of violence we live in as absence of common sense makes the medium equal to the message and there does not seem to be an actual message. This is assumed by politics (not cosmopolitan politics). I explain it:

Information in China, for example, is controlled by the state and the communist countries in the past, or some populisms simply seek to control information or propaganda, as they assume it is its real name, as a means to achieve their political goals. And, on the other hand, according to Chomsky, the media in the capitalist countries, particularly in the United States, are under the big companies control which “manufacture consensus” according to their interests, since they have a monopoly on information.

As some Chinese friends told me, in Hong Kong Western social networks, which are not allowed in mainland China but have deep roots in Hong Kong, do not allow to propagate arguments in favor of mainland China. If this would be the case, on the other hand, the many (human) resources of the Chinese state would occupy quickly those media by publishing massive arguments in favor of the interests of the People’s Republic, so that these media only admit information in favor of the protests. The situation reaches the absurd that since YouTube does not allow such content, some of these videos exposing arguments in favor of mainland China case are loaded in PornTube since it does not censure them, which, perhaps, also look beyond their actual message pointing out to that censorship in those Western supported media… Regarding the information some countries media give about others countries, I just very much wish this could be the last word on the subject.


Mozi said: “Criticizing without alternative is like trying to put out a fire with fire or stop a flood with water. Therefore, Mozi always said: Partiality must be replaced by universality. ” Communications have to be transparent, this means that they have to make their purpose explicit. The purpose includes the definition of what is intended and the benefits it shall provide as well as the means available for achieving it and the effort it requires. At this point, it is not even about our will to be inclusive, but just the transparent exposition of the purpose reveals its suitability for all of humanity and, therefore, in that way amounts to inclusive, joint decision-making, whose realization is common cooperation. Such are all advances in medicine, food, transport, etc. They are for everyone’s benefit without discrimination.

Each of the working groups of the Union Congress, as experts in their sector and knowledgeable about their resources, proposes the development objectives that best meet human needs and desires, assign tasks and cooperate for their achievement. The reorganization for cooperation that replaces the competing motivation for the monopoly (of innovation) is generated by replacing the imposition and violent submission by deprivation by rational and voluntary cooperation. The shared transparent purpose creates community.


We would like to organize as soon as possible a visit to Israel and Palestine, Gaza, and we are trying to raise funds to cover expenses for it in order to draw attention to the situation of the people there, particularly in the Gaza Strip, a place where there is no other interest than humanitarian and where, therefore, we precisely want to express and spread our proposal for human unity, as well as beginning our mediation work in Western Asia (Middle East) that leads to the truce prior to the Universal Congress.

Read more


Dear friends,


The celebration of the Human Unity Congress obtained the support and, to some extent, the commitment of the Madrid city council under Manuela Carmena team. However, despite the efforts of its head of International Action and Global Citizenship, Antonio Zurita Contreras, for the city to host the event as such and not as a partisan initiative, that approach seems not to be having continuity on the part of the new government of Madrid which has not contacted us yet.

The Call to the World Union Congress, however, is already made, it is published and what we try to agree with the city council is its date and venue to be able to issue preliminary invitations to the participants who are the most relevant people and companies in the following Groups of Work: Education / Humanities, Development, Technologies (divided into Food, Health, Mobility, Energy, Environment and Infrastructure), Security, Women and Communication. The Congress will be broadcast live and open to everyone and the plan is for its financing to be borne by the participating and sponsoring companies.


The Call to the Congress cannot be delayed because it is the means of spreading human unity proposal and also the means of the ceasefire, necessary for the celebration of the event. Truce has to take place as the Congress is gaining support because the Congress purpose is inclusive decision making and this is the end of partiality or sovereignty so that in this way violence stop making sense since violence inevitably claims for exclusion or sovereignty

Furthermore, the World Unity Congress cannot be carried out if there is no previous inclusive will, that is; if violence has not ceased. It would be contradictory to a united world or to a universal congress if there are parties (of course, of it) destroying each other so that stopping violence would constitute the greatest urgency and this would consist in setting the limits of the sovereignty of each party, again, the opposite of the purpose of the Congress.


The human condition of partiality or sovereignty in History gives rise to Law as a means of conflict resolution, but law cannot be the means for peace. The latter because its implementation always and only corresponds to the strongest, which does not mean that the result is the fairest but that according to the strongest interests, and the worst thing is that it only adds evil to evil because its operation is punishment after evil is accomplished.

But the Law is not human, it presupposes innocence (it is idealistic) refuses to see what eyes see: the bad intention or the strategy of the agents, that is, that all their movements tend to subdue, put the other at mercy (needless to say and vice versa) to manipulate and exploit it, does not see or judge about the production and distribution of weapons, whose purpose is damage, destruction, and homicide, etc.

However, the time of the Law has passed because today we can all live together, make inclusive and join decisions and we no longer need to put a blindfold on our eyes, self-deceive ourselves, deceive others, remain silent, lie and mystify youth when globalization allows and invites us to unity, to joint decision-making, which causes the purpose of harm to be absurd (or not inclusive) and transparency – the form for mutual and universal responsibility.


Are we, perhaps, incapable of it? That is a pointless question for those of us who call the Congress. In the meantime that the city council of Madrid does not answer we have made the proposal to the city council of Barcelona and we propose to the Catalans that they cease their claim to sovereignty and also to the Spanish state to release the independence prisoners expressing both their support for human unity or inclusive decision making and so their support to the World Unity Congress.

The Spanish state (the armed unit) cannot cancel its sovereignty, since this is a question or decision about itself as a subject – doing so would be equivalent to ceasing to be that subject and therefore would not even be a valid decision. But, the truth is that the Catalans assume that the constitution of sovereignty is a matter of popular will and, therefore, could not say that they are not in a position to propose human unity or human sovereignty.

Likewise, Spain, by accepting hosting the Congress shows its disposition towards the inclusiveness that would end up with sovereignty, all sovereignties, because, of course, it is a proposal to humanity that is only put in practice with the unanimous agreement of all (in the assumption that the Congress fails, it proves inclusive decision making unfeasible, prisoners would return to jail and the Catalans could continue to claim for their independence …)


Since the greatest implementation of HUM is in Spain, as Spaniards we have a limited right to request the release of prisoners, but Human Unity Movement is an NGO and does not discriminate against the nationality of those who support human unity.

In this sense, it is not the case that we ask the Spanish state for the release of prisoners because the cosmopolitans are not subjected to any partiality, we are not a ‘people’ in that sense of one who asks their leaders to do something (as protesters or climate change fighters, etc. do putting pressure on governments, asking them to enforce something), but we are free and equal human beings who assume personal sovereignty and we decide according to our own judgment and we make it public and we count for it not more just with only force, but with rationality and common sense.

Only in this way can we reject, mediate and dissolve violence in Western Asia (Middle East), where we want to move as soon as possible once we fix the data of Congress, in Latin America, in Hong Kong or where the violence is occurring, while as a ‘people’ (submitted to a state) we can only take part in favor of one side and against another.

Only if we assume personal sovereignty first can we then act from our institutional, political, business or personal positions to achieve the necessary truce for the celebration of the congress as well as later in the Congress to accept and act accordingly with human sovereignty.


In fact, the people who support the Congress cannot do it otherwise than from each one autonomy or personal will, assuming so our own will for peace or inclusive decision making, first becoming sovereign ourselves instead of submitting to an entity that only rules against another partiality under the absurdity of whatever (it might allies us with Russia, with China, with Turkey, with Iran, with Israel, with the EU, with the US, with India… ..) so these are our options, ever constrained or limited to whom (which armed unit or coalition) to attack, to defend from, whom to repress, etc. all that kind of possibilities, but peace.

Let us be cautious, but do not be afraid, truce could even be unilateral but peace cannot. Peace only occurs with agreement and cooperation of all, because we are all involved, so that partiality, which was a necessity a human condition, is now a mistake, the success right now is humanity striving to become a subject.

Read more



Ancient thinkers who already summoned us to human unity, most prominent of all both Mozí and the Western cosmopolitans, appealed also and at the same time to human Logos or Common Sense as the basis and foundation of their hope and their proposal, even if human unity was not possible at their time since decision taking could not be inclusive then and, therefore, it could only be strategic. And so this message today has the purpose of addressing the Common Sense of each person in a transparent way, this must be sincerity here, and, logically, from what one thinks and knows. And it is open to greater clarification or detail you might think of because we propose and hope to put into practice a new human relationship with important effects for each and every one of us.


A transparent and open Worldwide or Universal Congress to be held in Madrid in the autumn of 2020 and broadcast to the whole world to deal with how we human can live together, or what it is the same; to set up an inclusive decision-making system since the consequence of joining together is that we, consequently, will act and cooperate only for our benefit and never for our damage.


Those of us who now are calling this Conference, or also those who feel called or convened to it understand and want to make understand that the effect we want to achieve with our decision and invitation to unite is to end with evil, this is, bad intention, and to that end we just need transparency as the form of global governance.

Transparency is incompatible with both violence and the current command system, so is it the military, but also it is so with the political and business sectors, since current command necessarily includes exclusive knowledge, superior knowledge regarding the possession of data and the disposition of not sharing it, as well as the mystification of subordinates is the key for manipulating them. (You can see Socrates case in the Apology who refused to cooperate with the polis in making young Athenians to believe in the gods or how it is explicitly said in the Art of War, Chapter XI)


Thus, this is the understanding, the being and the commitment of the cosmopolitan citizen, one who is loyal to mankind, who frees himself and frees others by not submitting to an armed group – now, supervening; in the future, offender- because we give ourselves a basic law: No association can be established to harm others. That is our constitution, the source of the new human, cosmopolitan right. And so, we, all the people become the foundation and guarantee of unity from our direct and immediate commitment to each other.


It is not, therefore, that institutions, our current representatives or companies, will make, as usual, this decision of unity for us. We, each of us, personally, as subjects of judgment, reason and Common Sense, who, by using these capacities, emit our judgment and decision to unite and thus we free ourselves, we empower each other as human beings. And only after this the positions humans occupy in companies or institutions become humanized, serve humanity, because humanity has been constituted, it has become the subject of positive law, a law stating that humanity is the source of all rights and all resources and that people with and by their Common Sense are legislators, executors, judges and sovereigns -in replacement of the brute, irrational and uncontrollable force peculiar of the partiality of the states.

Our problem is not that we lack the capacity to understand each other and, therefore, are unable to cooperate in a mutual, common and universal way for mutual common benefit, the problem is that what we need to see or to know to understand and to judge is hidden from us. However, with human unity everyone’s eyes serve humanity and with them we all see the last and most remote confines of Earth and so we all know everything we need to know and we will use it, first of all, to put an end to bad intention, this is; investment in armament and then inclusive, agreed and joint disarmament.


Bad intention, the damaging aim, needs to be hidden and, therefore, cannot be judged (prevented). But it manifests itself in the means of harming which are the weapons. Thus, only if we are willing to adopt transparency, we have security with respect to our goodwill and desire to avoid and prevent damaging others. Although this will be put into practice only with the agreement and cooperation of all, since unilateral disarmament is just nonsense and, therefore, it is necessary to first spread this proposal for human unity to the whole world. This communication is actually the World Unity Congress Call.

Damaging necessarily has one objective: the other. But this objective disappears with human unity. And human unity takes shape, it is staged in the World Unity Congress. In it, being it inclusive, lacking the other as an object of harm, the task of the participants is to establish objectives of service, welfare and human development only. Objectives to which they redirect the resources released from destruction or strategic objectives – the cause of the current irrational production, doping, exploitation and abuse of people.
It is not capitalism -as it is usually indoctrinated and believed- which prevents human resources from being allocated to meet people’s needs, but rather strategic interests -people are also of some strategic interest, but quite limited. State leadership directs ineludibly its utmost effort towards strategic objectives (relative to the army = strato in Greek) because their security is the most important issue. This is its reason to be and for that reason the state rescues the banks and not the people or invests in high technology and not in feeding those who die of hunger. States are looking for what gives them a competitive advantage over other states and makes the others dependent, no matter what it costs in human terms.

War, as Clausewitz would put it, is constant or absolute and productive or capitalist investment is made out of strategic sense. Contrary to what Marxism anticipated, the socialism of the Soviet Union could not bear / compete against the strategic superiority of capitalism and consumerism. United, however, our development is relative to the common interest, development ceases to be ‘capitalist’, stop being strategic to become human. For example, if we develop ophthalmology we serve humanity, because we all have eyes, and so on and so forth and so will the case of high-tech developments that are also useful and valuable, but their purpose will be exclusively its service to humanity, while their current development aim is the superiority or advantage of some states over others, that is why that development is so intensive, that is what strategic means.


All the work of the Congress derives from that inclusive will and, therefore, goodwill, expressed in the very fact that the Congress is held. With the Congress, on that particular date and at that point bad intention or evil ceases, this is; arms investment, development, purchase, etc. around the world stops. This is the beginning. We all give up to the will, conception, design and production of objects whose purpose is damaging and it will be followed by the dismantling of the existing means of destruction, their recycling, which is also the improvement of cooperation: barriers elimination and bridges building.

The outcome of the Congress, as well as in general the inclusive decision-making system, is accurate, predetermined, clear, safe, sure in that it ends with evil and seeks only benefit, it is only uncertain regarding some details, specifically the evaluation of the proposals for improvement or development of human well-being raised by any person, here mainly by the experts summoned to the Congress, where these evaluations refer to the relationship with the resources available, as well as their order of priority or opportunity cost in relation to the common interests of humanity, etc.


On the other hand, we know from the same logic that the potential (the strategic aim) or actual development of destruction means of others worries us and that our own development of destruction means worries them (whatever they may be). And the result of it is the infinite arms race and war – the purpose of destruction of the other’s means of destruction – as the way of human relationship is neither desirable nor advantageous to anyone. The maintenance, justification or defense of this system can only originate from deception, superstition.


Any destructive development (particular development) puts us more at the mercy of others or others of ours. Does it happen that you cannot think of a world without some at mercy of others or without violence? It can be thought, in fact many have thought about it, it is the ‘common cause’, the shared objective, this is the form of peace – a common cause that is only possible today, that is: of all (if not inclusive (universal), cooperation keep being strategic) – and this common cause is, after the coverage of needs, well-being and inclusive development. To this basic understanding we are referring when making the decision to join. Let´s replace aggressive (partial) decision taking by inclusive decision taking.


The will to make decisions inclusive or to unite is to be a punctual decision which is taken now, here, already and it is staged in the World Unity Congress and from that point it remains indefinitely. However, people´s behavior, our relationship towards one another needs a period for our habits to adapt towards the harmony of the community that, in turn, the community will facilitate by also staging the appropriate conditions for this purpose – in contrast with the current brutalization, abuse, deception and mystification of people as consequence of partiality


We are already some people working on the World Unity Congress Call and with some more help we will be able to communicate with people involved in violent acts and that will allow us to stop violence, so in Western Asia as in other areas of the world, including the riots in Hong Kong, Chile, Catalonia and other places, because destruction caused by violent activity has as its objective, target and justification the other´s means of destruction, just as the means of destruction of one are based on the means of destruction of the other and have no other justification nor possible reason to be, so those means are a bottomless pit of waste.

Violence enters in contradiction with human unity will, whose consequence is the elimination of all means of destruction without violence and with everybody´s cooperation. Therefore, violence can now be stopped by the Call to the World Unity Congress, which is universal and real peace and not illusory wish and so the Call immediate effect is truce, until the celebration of the Congress next autumn where peace or unity enters into force and with it the effective elimination of the means of destruction.


If you understand the end, the means and the consequences of this Call, you also have to make it also because, if you want human coexistence you cannot at the same time have bad intentions, this is to sustain destruction means. Unity ends with destruction means, so the will to unity is good intention, and unity requires the Call (to Congress), while a (supposedly good) will no calling the Congress is a hidden will which is the feature of bad will, the one not allowing to be judged, whose result is other´s also prevented from being judged too (perhaps and sometimes only when the crime is already committed). Be aware.

The Call to the World Unity Congress is the Call to human coexistence, human living together instead of in confrontation and aggression and does not need these above perhaps complex reasoning because the Call to the World Unity Congress by itself implies everything said.

Thus, you see how your participation is possible and necessary; we all depend on you.

Thank you!

Read more

دعوة إلى المؤتمر الدولي للوحدة الإنسانية

أصدقائي الأعزاء
معكم مانويل هيررانز رئيس حركة الوحدة الإنسانية، (
أدعوكم للمشاركة في الحدث العالمي للوحدة الإنسانية الذي سيعقد في خريف عام ٢٠٢٠، وفي هذا الحدث سوف نُناقش ونُؤسس الوحدة، حيث تتخذ القرارات المشتركة والشاملة.
سيقام المؤتمر في مدريد “حضورياً” مع نخبة من المختصين في مواضيع متعلقة بالوحدة البشرية، سوف يٌنشرالمؤتمر عن طريق بث عالمي مفتوح بشفافية كاملة.

إذا وصلتكم الرسالة أرجو نشرها، أفهم حقاً أنها تهمكم وتعني لكم الكثير. في الوقت الراهن نحن فقط مجموعة من الأشخاص بمواردنا المحدودة الراعي لهذا الحدث. على العموم نُرحب بإقتِراحاتكم بخصوص التحسين أو الإعلان والنشر بالتواصل معنا على
بهذه الوحدة نعتزم العمل على الوضع الحالي للضرر (أسلحة، جيوش) أو الضرر المتناقض الغير مقبول (ضرر الشخص نفسه إلحاق الآذى بنفسه)، بأن تصبح التنمية والأمن منتشرة ومشتركة. بهذا الفهم المنطقي ووفقًا لهذا الغرض، فإن الاتحاد هو الإرادة الجماعية لجميع الأشخاص، وبهذه الطريقة سيكون كل فرد على حدة والبشرية بالمجمل مسؤولين هذا يضمن لنا الوحدة. (يمكنك الحصول على مزيد من المعلومات حول مفهومنا لهذا المشروع على صفحتنا واستقبال استفساراتكم، على سبيل المثال في الجزء السفلي من هذا المنشور).
خلال المؤتمر سوف نُنشيء نظام للأمن واتخاذ القرارات للتعاون من أجل تنمية شفافة وشاملة ومشتركة. لهذا نحتاج إلى وسيلة اتصال موثوقة ومستقرة تسهل مشاركة الجميع دون تمييز، لذلك هذه الدعوة موجهة إلى الشركات أو خبراء فريق العمل للاتصال في الكونغرس, للمشاركة في تنظيم الحدث مع HUM (ألق نظرة على مجموعة الكونغرس على موقع
نظراً بأن جمهور المؤتمر من جميع أنحاء العالم وأيضاََ الشركات المشاركة، ينبغي أن يسهل لهم الوصول إلى جميع الأسواق بالإضافة المشاركة في تصميم مستقبل التواصل واتخاذ القرارات مع التطورات الجديدة المضاعفة لانفتاح الأسواق العالمية، في الوقت الراهن موجهة لأغراض عسكرية.
في الواقع نهاية الحدث الإتحاد الإنساني يجب أن يكون قد شُكِل وأن يكون لديه الصلاحية لتفعيل السياسين في كل الدول لتنسيق الاتحاد والتعاون الدولي ونزع السلاح أن يكون بطريقة جماعية مشتركة ومتفق عليها ومتبادلة. وأيضاً لأجل تشكيل فريق للتنسيق يسهل ويضمن الشفافية والتفاهم والاتفاق. الجهد الاستثماري لكل دولة في أمنها أو دفاعها ينقل إلى شركات وفقا لأولويات التنمية التي اقترحتها مجموعات العمل في الكونغرس، والجيوش الحالية الفعالة تنشغل بمهام التنمية العاجلة إلى أن يتم تسريحها بالكامل (الشرطة تتبع عملية أخرى).
المحرك لهذه الوحدة هو الإنسانية (لا ينبغي أن يكون صعب ما هو طبيعي)، الهدف إنساني وليس سياسي. نطالب بالإنسانية ونرفض الإبادة الجماعية، شيء لا يظهر بين الإجراءات / الخيارات السياسية، وندعم الاتحاد دون تأخير لأنه يجب ألا (نوافق) على إلحاق الضرر للكثير من الأشخاص الذين يعانون منه الآن عندما يمكننا تجنبه.
إن دعم الوحدة الإنسانية يعادل أن يكون جزءًا من جميع الأطراف، وأن يعاني مثلنا الضرر من الحقوق المنتهكة. هذه الدعوة تطلب الهدنة حيثما يوجد صراع من أي نوع، دولي أو محلي، عام أو خاص، على الرغم من أننا ندعو بشكل خاص أشخاصاً من غرب آسيا.
إن أصل الصراع بين البشر هو “شرعية” العنف، والتي سننهيها في أقرب وقت في خريف عام 2020 ، لذلك لم يعد يستحق إلحاق الضرر للحصول على هذه الشرعية.


Read more


Yes, it is our business, because, unlike other issues, such as climate change, gender-based violence, etc., on which the ‘people’ asks and urges the authorities (of the states) with demonstrations, strikes and pressures to enforce ‘measures’; peace is human unity and, consequently, it calls into question state sovereignty.

Indeed, peace is unity or the system of inclusive and joint human decision-making, instead of the partial decision-making of the states, which inevitably leads to their confrontation. Unity makes damage or entrepreneurship for damage absurd and human activity is limited to cooperation for common benefit. And yet in unity we, people, are still the cause, responsibility and guarantee of peace, for we ‘outlaw’ violence, that is, any association whose purpose or effect causes harm to others.

Despite how obviously beneficial such a relationship of universal cooperation for the common benefit would be for all people, proposing human unity involves questioning state sovereignty and therefore cannot be exposed to public opinion which is partial ( limited to the population of a state), where the information is generated or controlled by it. What people know, think or talk, but what’s on TV and newspapers? Everything else vanishes. For this reason, the convening of a Universal Congress on Unity, even without the support it needs, visualizes that this questioning is projected and has a universal reach, as it needs.

But what does it actually mean that states cannot question their own sovereignty? It is not a theoretical question or an abstraction; it means that the state cannot consider a joint command over all the armed forces of the world including their own so that the dissolution and elimination of all weapons follows, because weapons are only one because another. (Certainly this possibility has only become possible in our day with globalization, but a lot of thinkers, then hidden or misrepresented, both in the West; as the Cynics, the Stoics, the monotheistic religions, etc., as in East; Mozi, Confucianism, etc., clearly perceived that unity is the only form of peace, even without knowing the limits of the world or its inhabitants – while we now know them well).

However, today 21 September we celebrate the day of peace, a wish of all, but whose condition is ignored; the agreed union of the armed forces under a single command (as those of Iran, the US, China, the Taliban, Russia and about 200 more there) because of their unity, in whatever form, it is their dissolution. The question to our will in this regard puts us in the right position, in the disjunction between being a ‘people’ of a state, the (legitimate) violence, or humanity and peace, the ‘illegitimacy’ of all violence, which makes us free and interdependently sovereign people.

Read more

Призыв к Всемирному конгрессу за единство человечества

Дорогой друг,

Я – Мануэль Херранц, президент движения HUM – Human Unity Movement ( и я от всего сердца приглашаю вас принять участие в глобальном мероприятии, которое состоится осенью 2020 года, на котором все люди объединятся для заключения договорa для принятия инклюзивных и совместных решений. Конгрес в Мадриде объединит лучших экспертов по вопросам, связанным с объединением всех людей и это пройдет в универсальной, прозрачной, открытой и полной форме.

Если вы читаете это сообщение, я прошу вас распространить его. Я понимаю, что оно действительно касается вас и интересует вас, и на данный момент мы люди, с нашими ограниченными ресурсами должны стать источником распространения этого движения. Также ваши предложения по улучшению публикации или распространения этого мероприятия приветствуются на

Объединившись, тем самым мы обеспечим что нынешняя предпринимательская деятельность в области вооружения и формирования армий станет абсурдной или противоречивой (это будет вредить себе), а безопасность и развитие станут общей целью и результом. При таком логическом понимании и в соответствии с этой целью союз является единодушной волей всех людей, и таким образом каждый отдельный человек и человечество в целом будут нести ответственность за него и гарантировать единство. (Вы можете получить больше информации о нашем понимании этого проекта на нашей странице и задать любые вопросы, которые могут у вас возникнуть).

В ходе конгресса мы намереваемся создать систему безопасности чтобы принимать решення для сотрудничества, направленную на открытое и совместное развитие. Для этого нам нужно надежное и стабильное средство связи, которое позволит участие всех без какой-либо дискриминации. Поэтому это сообщение направлено также компаниям и экспертам Рабочей группы по коммуникациям Конгресса для организации мероприятия совместно с HUM.
Поскольку аудитория Конгресса находится по всему миру, доступ к этим СМИ (как и к другим участвующим компаниям) также распространен по всему миру. Этот доступ ко всем рынкам должен быть облегчен для разработки будущих средств информации. Ресурсы предназначенные для военных целей должны быть использованы для развития этих средств информации.

К концу мероприятия человеческий союз должен принять форму и силу, способные побудить политиков каждого государства координировать свои действия в этом союзе и сотрудничестве, а также в разоружении (одновременном, совместном, согласованном, взаимном …). Для этого Координационная группа также может быть сформирована для содействия и обеспечения прозрачности, понимания и согласия. Инвестиционные усилия каждого государства направленные на его безопасность или оборону пойдут на развитие компаний, в соответствии с приоритетами, предложенными рабочими группами Конгресса и нынешними войсками армий для решения наиболее неотложных задач и до их полной демобилизации.

Импульс единства – человечный (не должен быть сложным, что естественно), гуманный, а не политический. Мы требуем человечности, мы отказываемся от геноцида, что сегодня не фигурирует среди политических действий государств. Мы незамедлительно поддерживаем союз, потому что мы больше не хотим приносить вред людям, когда мы можем избежать этого сейчас.

Поддерживать человеческое единство означает быть частью всех сторон. Этот призыв требует перемирия там, где есть конфликт любого рода, международный или внутренний, государственный или частный.
Источником каждого конфликта между людьми является «легитимность» насилия, с которой мы покончим вместе осенью 2020 года. Нет больше смысла приносить ущерб кому бы то ни было.


Read more

Call to the World Congress for Human Unity

Dear friend,

I am Manuel Herranz, president of HUM – Human Unity Movement. ( and I wholeheartedly invite you to participate in a global event to be held in the autumn of 2020 in which all humans deal and establish unity, that is; inclusive and joint decision making. The event would consist of a face-to-face Conference or Congress in Madrid of (the best) experts in matters related to human unity and in a universal, transparent, open and complete broadcasting of it.

If this message arrives to you, I beg you to spread it, I understand that it really concerns you and interests you and for now we are only the people with our limited resources the means of this call. Also your proposals or suggestions for improvement or publication or diffusion of it are welcome at

With unity we intend that the current entrepreneurship for damage (weapons, armies) or damage becomes absurd or contradictory (it would be harming oneself) and security and development are shared, common. With that logical understanding and according to that purpose, union is the unanimous will of all people and in this way each individual person and humanity as a whole will be responsible, cause and guarantee of unity. (You can get more information about our understanding of this project on our page and raise any questions you may have, for example at the bottom of this post)

During the congress we set out to establish a security and decision-making system for cooperation aiming at transparent, inclusive and joint development and for this we need a reliable and stable communication mean that facilitates the participation of all without discrimination, therefore, this is also an invitation to the companies or experts of the Congress Communication Working Group (see Congress groups at to organize the event together with HUM.

Since the audience of the Congress is worldwide, the exposure of these media (like the other participating companies) is also worldwide and should facilitate their access to all markets, in addition to participating in the design of the future of communications and decision making with new developments multiplied by the release of resources so far destined for military purposes.

Indeed, at the end of the event, the human union must have taken form and vigor capable of moving the politicians of each state to coordinate in the universal union and cooperation and also in disarmament (simultaneous, joint, agreed, reciprocal …) for which a coordination team can also be formed in order to facilitate and ensure transparency, understanding and agreement. The investment effort of each state in its security or defense goes to companies according to the development priorities proposed by the Working Groups of the Congress and the current troops of the armies to deal with the most urgent development tasks until their complete demobilization (the police follows another process).

The impulse of unity is human (it should not be difficult what is natural), humanitarian and not political. We claim humanity, we refuse genocide, something that does not appear among the political actions / options, and we support the union without delay because we should not (consent) to harm so many people who are suffering it right now when we can avoid it.

Supporting human unity is equivalent to being part of all parties and suffering as our own the damage they infringe and this call demands the truce where there is conflict of any kind, international or domestic, public or private, although we call particularly to the people of West Asia.

The origin of every conflict among humans is ‘legitimacy’ of violence, which we will end together as soon as in autumn 2020, so it is no longer worth damaging to be entitled to it.

Thank you.

Read more

The Human Condition

Dear friends of humanity, supporters of HUM – Human Unity Movement,

The current situation of our activities and projects is pending on the response of the Madrid City Council to set a date and venue where to hold the Universal Congress we are proposing for autumn next year. Once we have this information, we can officially launch the call, as much the invitations to participants or speakers at the Congress as also the Congress worldwide publicity for which we will first invite as co-organizers some of the most relevant international communication companies in order to stablish as soon as possible a proper (unbiased) communication channel or system for the event. Our purpose is for Congress to result in a unanimous worldwide agreement on human unity with the Universal Constitution that starts Posthistory.

Meanwhile I would like to reflect once more on the theoretical aspects which encourage this call to human unity and for this I share the title above with that of a book by Hannah Arendt, whose basic statement is that “necessity gives the human being right to violence ”and it seems to me that this nonsense collects and summarizes one or, properly, the most widespread and significant representation of the world of these last centuries, shared by the right and left (Marxism) parties, habitual of all media, of textbooks, university chairs, etc., so it is very necessary to review it and expose its misery.

Any violence is, of course, all violence (as a weapon is all weapons), since it is impossible for someone to voluntarily accept violence and, therefore, that there is a right to exercise it, so that, consequently, he does not only will respond with violence if he can (or perhaps that is also his right); not only because of how difficult it is for a subject to accept to be harmed, as such a right assumes, but mainly because it is objectively and factually contradictory that there is a will which is not voluntary at the time – since it is imposed by another.

And the proof of the absurdity of that representation (although – I insist – it is universally assumed) is that this ‘right’ to violence is putting us on the verge of devastation of our own and all other people’s resources, and of human o even life extinction? Such a situation and result can only be understood as the product of absolute, uncontrolled violence (of the weapon against other weapons) and not as violence as a mean of something else.

It is therefore very important to reconsider and pour (new) light on human condition. Although food, water (clothing and housing….) are necessary conditions for the subsistence or life of plants and animals, including humans, contrary to what is usually assumed and pretended the (supposed) lack or shortage of these essential resources is not the cause of the violence that characterizes human relations but the deprivation of those resources by the weapon or arm – actually in its common appearance of armed unit or state (previously it could be called tribe, horde, clan, family or the name we want to put it). First, from the need or lack of resources does not follow violence; common sense understands such human needs and it is therefore capable of share them instead of using violence (which common sense also understands as necessarily absolute) agreeing a distribution of resources even in the most extreme case of acute shortage. Violence is absolutely undesirable and cannot be the object of ‘right’ except in fantasy, because, although the state declares itself legitimate violence, which everyone must confess, violence is the real illegitimacy itself. And it occurs only because it is beyond our control; even the most powerful one exercises violence against his desire.

Apart from the remarkable and punctual use of the weapon killing and destroying, its consubstantial, constant and permanent effect is to deprive (prevent, deny) and privatize (resources). Indeed, with regard to the coverage of material needs, the weapon is the necessary and sufficient condition of private property. It is necessary because without the mediation of the weapon private property is impossible; private property is not sustainable without the threat or violence that the weapon provides and projects and, therefore, private property is unthinkable without its presupposition, that is, as an existence, premise and precondition of the possibility of ownership and not vice versa. And sufficient because the weapon, since its aim is damaging, is necessarily private (the only object that it is so in its essence) and leads to everything else becoming private as its own resource; although property is attributed to individuals it does not really belong to them but to the armed unit or state that grants it and gives them a needed coverage or protection. This is the same in communist countries or in capitalist countries; states do not really put into play with their policies their subjects’ well-being but the dominance over the other armed units, as it corresponds to their nature.

Thus, the human condition is the weapon, present in nature prior to the appearance of our specie and to which we, like other species, adapt according to our abilities and means. We can say that weapon -both, in its form of an object or artifact and in its organizational form, the army- is the top human production at all times and in all places. It just does not seem that way to us in the present, because, despite their supreme and decisive condition at all times equally, weapons are absent from the media and the public sphere, they are a secret reserved for intelligence, although Its development, here and now, concentrates the best human and material resources and is the destination of the most advanced technologies and so will it be perceived in the future, as we can see when looking at the past, since all technological development has at first a main military use (ships, vehicles, airplanes, internet, etc.) and the design and decisions on everything that concerns the state is strategic, its provision is the most appropriate or advantageous for war, we have already mentioned its policies, but, for example, so is it with the foundation of cities, frequently transport routes, fortifications or castles with the slums around them, etc.

The weapon’s proper form is the armed unit, the state, that is, the interrelation of all weapons under a single command without whose consent they cannot be used. The armed unit is constituted in the form of a pyramid, the one appropriate to its being a chain of command from a single head and whose relationship with its subordinates is of imposition. The natural tendency of that pyramid is to submit every human or natural resource by its base integrating it into the lowest part of the hierarchy. This violent and pyramidal structure can only be counteracted or resisted from another equally pyramidal structure and between the two the relations are of imposition and deterrence.

In the territory of each state, every weapon is incorporated or is illegal (except in some countries where weapons are provided to individuals so that they end up with individuals particularly undesirable for the state, but never to rival it) and every illegal weapon must be destroyed, in correspondence to the monopoly of state violence. Likewise, the other armed units (the other states) are also outside the system of legality that emanates from each state in particular and are, therefore, enemies and must be equally incorporated or ultimately destroyed, except that they are allies in time to submit and destroy a third party.

Whoever has greater destructive capacity regulates relationships and whoever has less destructive capacity assumes them. And if he refuses to obey, he who has the greatest destructive capacity can destroy the disobedient’s weapons or deprive him of his subsistence resources and put him at his mercy (such is the process now in Iran, Venezuela …). War is absolute, because I insist: Insumission is not an option but an unavoidable tendency, our wish to develop our strength, seek freedom, just as it is not an option for the most powerful or lethal to always be undermining others development or directly destroying it to preserve its supremacy. The idealistic illusion of each hegemony is that peace is achieved with the application of its legal system universally of which it is the guarantor and shall be provided with superior means of destruction. This is something unreal, since that perception remains in not looking at the weapon condition, as we do in the present analysis.

Violence is absolute and, in the absence of another ‘criterion’ than force, its inexorable tendency is equality or balance of opposites, so that states have to organize themselves in coalitions, it is very difficult for a single armed unit to be able to overcome all others. For that reason, the ideological figurations are particularly important, since being them idealistic (not perceiving the weapon) or irrational (lacking common sense) they are adapted to partiality, since if we perceive the weapon as it is; equal to each other, both ours and that of the enemy, as well as its analogous effect on us and on our enemies is manifested to us, it turns out that it also makes us all as we really are: equal and indiscriminate. For that reason, such a perception of the weapon could not be revealed in the past because it would have been a unilateral use of common sense (humanity) that would have resulted in self-harm or harm on our side and for the benefit of the enemy, so that the state, with a kind of justice, could not allow it. That is why the polis or state condemns Socrates for “not believing in the polis gods and (therefore) corrupting the youth” while Socrates, indeed, simply stated that he had no other wisdom, knowledge or understanding than a human one and he did not know, nor he intended as his fellow citizens to know about such things as gods or their designs (which actually would led them to make war). Therefore, his many followers became cosmopolitan, advocates of human unity (except those financed by the state as Plato and Aristotle) because they understood that common sense was only applicable in a universal context, a condition that, anyway, did not occur in his time. And the same happened in the Chinese culture with Mozi. But today it is, finally, possible to use common sense, universally expose and manifest reality, the determination of the weapon, and so liberate us all together. For that reason we convene a Universal Congress on Human Unity because together we will only project, build and do everything for our development, well-being and happiness and we will discard and eliminate projections, production and activities for damaging since, in unity, entrepreneurship for harming will be something as absurd, contradictory and foolish as one looking for harming himself.

Now, as the previous false representation of the world, even if unanimously accepted in our time, we have expressed citing Hannah Arentd justified violence and concealed the weapon and was an expression / confession of the legitimacy of the modern system of sovereign states, armed units or legitimate violence, that representation also projects us a possible human unity distorted from its meaning, necessarily violent and regulated by a super-state – a legitimate violence – necessary to protect and guarantee the property and security of the people and, therefore, a unit easily exposed to ‘civil’ wars that will take us to the fight for the control of that legitimate violence, the peak of the pyramid, or the dissolution of it in its way back to the current situation of a number of armed units in conflict for a certain predominance.

That is why it is extremely important to understand the falsity of that (economic) representation of reality and use common sense and with it understand the effects of human unity. Being the first and foremost effect of unity freeing us from the weapon, since the practice of unity is nothing else, nor can it be that the elimination of borders and armies, without remaining a single one as they are meaningless without each other. As well as inclusive and joint decision-making, cooperation for development and for our well-being, the increase of our capabilities and any possible realization of happiness of each and every one of us instead of dedicating ourselves to limit ourselves and prevent each other by weapon virtue. Disarmament is the sweet process of humanity adapting to itself.

Joining us will free us from the current confusion in which good and evil are intermingled, for evil, of course towards the enemy, is even more useful, better or even more beneficial than any real good for our side. Together, the difference between the good – what is useful, what promotes our well-being and our happiness – and the bad – the weapon, what is for harming will be as clear as we distinguish white from black or sweet from bitter and there will be no place for evil to take shape.

Human unity ends the genocide or homicide of human groups; not because a superior force, that of the human unity or community, is imposed on minority parties, groups willing to annihilate each other as it is happening in History where violence is absolute, because it was not that these groups had a tendency to mutually annihilate or that humans have an innate disposition to violence, homicide. It is necessary to understand that, while the violence was absolute, irremediable, the violent methods, their training, preparation, disposition and articulation particularly in case of alarm were not only pertinent but of the maximum necessity for life and genocide a constant event and with it, any analogy would do for group building and group operations required by violence. But to unite is to end up with violence; This ceases to be a human resource and, therefore, these groups (Catholics, Chinese, Muslims, Russians, Whites, Hispanics …) no longer constitute a latent and possible articulation for participation in the ever-present virtual violence, genocide or possible bloody struggle; the absolute war that dominates the world is given by the existence of the weapon, as Cervantes says “it is the same weapons than war.” Human unity ends genocide because it generates disarmament and disarmament puts an end to violence. That is why human unity is a qualitative change; “civil war” cannot happen because unity roots out violence and prevents its germ that is partiality –this is, independent and, therefore, opposite decision making.

The main contribution of human unity is to define and declare all violence illegitimate to be substituted with use of common sense, which allows us and leads us to do everything voluntarily, with the approval of each and every one of us. We cannot foresee in detail some aspects of this new world of post-history, as well as the character of its institutions if they were necessary, and other details that we must open to our common and cooperative judgment. What we can foresee is that the first step is to achieve the unanimous human will for unity, which results in a mandate for current politicians, whose legitimacy was only given before by the state from which they obtain the power of their representativeness, while now the origin of its legitimacy will be humanity as the ultimate source of all rights.

Likewise, it goes without saying that with rational (and not political), inclusive and joint criteria, we must face the new challenges of pollution, the use of renewable energy, climate change, deforestation, animal treatment and environmental treatment in general terms – which we all share now. These are tasks that, more than urgently, cry out for human unity, because only in this way can we cope with them since its threatening character resides, above all, in the inability we show ourselves of dealing with them separately and the need it presents for generating a joint and coordinated response which is prevented by the weapon (or partiality).

I invite you and encourage you to participate in the preparation of the Universal Congress on Human Unity that will mark our passage to post History.

Thank you!

Read more

Genocide is now an option

The war is a genocide. In war people are killed according to an appellative or adjective, usually their nationality; like Russians, Chinese, Germans, etc., Although it can also be another qualifier, usually religious, also political, as, for example, Protestants, Jews , capitalists, grand landowners, etc. …, they are also killed according to a qualifier, even if not in international war.

I understand Hannah Arendt speaks of the “banality of evil” referring to the frivolity with which anyone pronounces himself in favor or against one or other groups, always assuming that genocidal disposition. This is, in fact, evil, even if it seems a thousand times worse that a friend fails or betrays us, or someone does not keep his word and those issues that hurt our hearts, our pride and dignity. These behaviors derive from that radical evil and not the other way around, let´s not confuse things – because, according to our disposition to genocide, we are all already guilty, lost our dignity, it is our original sin from which all the others emanate.

History makes us to assume genocide naturally, it is very familiar to each one of us, we live in it, with it, just as we coexist accepting that our ultimate goal is the development of a hellish machinery of destruction and death and young people in good spirits are prepared for selective and mass murder.

This naturalness, good spirit, unconsciousness itself has its logic as it is accompanied by a feeling of tragic need, which is our life and our common history. However, friends, today we can end with “evil”, original or radical evil, if we unite, if we make decisions jointly and inclusively we can not plan our own destruction, something that is possible today.

So, today genocide is no longer a necessity, but an option. An option that we must all voluntarily reject, choosing human unity by spreading the unity proposal call and participating and preparing together the Universal Unity Congress we propose to celebrate in autumn 2020.

Read more