1. Arms are the same as war.

The weapon is the purpose to harm the other as much as possible to subjugate him - to make him give up his will, for that will is to arm himself as much as possible to subjugate the first for the same reason. And if neither is thus imposed, war follows - whether preventive, indirect or direct - which is ‘the attempt or action to disarm the enemy’.

The weapon does not subjugate by its effective use (death, destruction) but by its potentiality – the effect of its use is anticipated. And its power lies in its mere existence - already given by itself and to which humans assimilate.

The weapon is the ultimate human production in every time and place (also in the future that we anticipate) and the real object of everything that is made; cities, infrastructure, inventions, technologies..., although it is not shared with us today, we know from the past that everything is meant to reinforce the weapon.

2. The purpose of harm is not publicly shared.

All humans are incorporated into an armed unit (and/or state), a system of hierarchical submission or total inequality (injustice) that deprives us of freedom and humanity.

If one person does evil: harms another, and this is made public, everyone condemns it, for justice, peace, as well as cooperation for mutual benefit is the common interest, but exploiting others to strengthen the weapon and harm and kill the enemy is rewarded. And someone who refuses to exploit or kill others is either forced to obey orders on pain of being punished or even executed as a deserter, so that deception and violence are prevalent for our relations.

Since their origin, armed units have manifested themselves through ideologies that their subjects must learn in schools and other means in such a way that it is difficult for them to face reality, that they are prevented from mutual understanding with people outside and only submitted to an army or military alliance.

3. Disarmament is universal.

Inclusive decision-making brings about the common good and prevention of harm.

But the first inclusive decision must be disarmament, something that is only possible with the cooperation of all, and therefore impossible until now, since partial disarmament only resulted in serving another army. That is why inclusiveness as the form of human peace and harmony, although well known to the sages of the past, has not been taught to us, because not only was it not feasible, but it would have weakened the party spreading it.

Since all human beings are in contact now, let us reconcile ourselves by sharing this message and let us replace submission to the weapon with public (inclusive, universal) decisions, stopping all weapons development and initiating disarmament because weapons are only for each other, let now all of us cooperate to beat swords into plowshares ...