Welcome to

Movement of
HUMAN UNITY

freedom is peace

The reason humans do not cooperate for the common good and instead dedicate ourselves to mutual destruction is, obviously, the lack of freedom. Mutual destruction cannot be anyone’s will or desire. 

The current system of laws and rights cannot avoid war. If someone harms another, they can reconcile or, in the worst case, abide by mediation so that they do not destroy each other, however, the weapon deprives freedom (of free will); it subdues without ‘harming’, because it does so from its power/potential. And a weapon can only be countered with another weapon (as or more powerful). If neither prevails, mutual destruction -war- follows (“the attempt or action to disarm the enemy”) because what is at stake is the will that governs the other without any alternative, since the will that prevails is not free either; it cannot be other than to continue arming itself as much as it can and prevent the other from doing so.

The fact that the weapon acts from its power also means that it does so from its mere existence, prior to that of the human being, so humans had no other option than to adapt to it and live immersed in its diabolical vicious circle.

for a world republic

Peace cannot be based on imposition. Freedom is the voluntary act of cooperation among people who share a common purpose, to which each contributes because they understand it is in their own interest.

The weapon is to kill us, harm us and destroy each other, so we all understand that its improvement is to kill faster, more people, in one blow, better avoid enemy defense systems, and so on.

All other objects are meant to serve us, and when we understand their purpose, or how something is used, we also understand their improvement; in a car go faster, safer, carry more, use less gasoline, in a table be lighter and stronger, etc., with which we also know implicitly who, when, how those means should be used in the service of the human being.

What happens now is that weapons subordinate these objects to their own purpose (they deprive them of their service to humanity), because the weapon, which has the purpose of harm (to the other), obviously can only be private, and, likewise, what serves one weapon cannot serve another.

However, if humans unite in a world republic the weapon becomes useless and redundant, because its cause or reason for being is itself/against itself. Thus, we are freed, and, with weapons excluded, those same objects help, clarify, and facilitate our relationships, as these are also based on mutual and common service to our shared humanity.

information

The means of the republic (res publica = public matter), as well as that of simple cooperation without imposition or free and voluntary, is the information or publicity of the reason for being or purpose of something. Through whose knowledge one freely cooperates if one finds that it is in one’s own interest. So this same message or information you are reading now is the very foundation of the republic.

Although states call themselves republics, they cannot truly be so, because the weapon—that is, the purpose of harm—cannot be made public. To make it public is, in fact, to make it universal. For this reason, the system of states inevitably includes secrecy and the mystification of their subjects. In contrast, the functioning of the republic is based on the dissemination of the purpose or rationale of what is universally proposed, and apart from weapons, there is no contradiction among us, for everything is meant to serve us.

Publicity and transparency are also guarantees—and mechanisms of accountability—that ensure there is no deceit, harm, confusion, or ill intent, but only benefit for all.

For a world republic

Who we are

We promote human inclusive decision-making for the common good.

Our Mission Statement

We promote a World Republic

Our Goal

Human peace and concord.

Message for reconciliation

1 - The weapon is the same as the war

The weapon is the purpose to harm the other as much as possible in order to subdue him and make him give up his will, for that will is to arm himself as much as possible in order to subdue the first for the same reason.
And if none prevail, war follows – whether preventive, indirect or direct – which is ‘the attempt or action to disarm the enemy’. The weapon does not subdue by its actual use (death, destruction) but by its power – its actual use is anticipated.
And its potency is its mere existence – already given in nature and to which humans adapted. The weapon is the ultimate human production in every time and place (also in the future that we anticipate) and the real object of everything that is made; cities, infrastructures, inventions, technologies…, although it does not share with us today, we know from the past that everything seeks to reinforce the weapon.

2 - The purpose of the harm is not shared publicly.

All humans are incorporated into an armed unit (and/or state), a system of hierarchical submission, or total inequality (injustice), which deprives them of freedom and humanity.

If one person does wrong: harms another, and this is made public all condemn it, for justice, peace, as well as cooperation for mutual benefit is the common interest, but exploiting others so that the weapon is strengthened and harming and killing the enemy is rewarded.
And if someone refuses to exploit or kill others they are forced to obey orders or penalised or even executed as deserters, so deception and violence are prevalent in our relationships.

Since their origin, armed units have manifested themselves through ideologies that their subjects have to learn in schools and other means, making it difficult for them to face reality, preventing them from understanding each other and only showing submission to a weapon or alliance.

3. Disarmament is universal

Inclusive decision making results in the common good and prevention of harm.

But the first inclusive decision has to be disarmament, which is only possible with the cooperation of all and therefore only possible today, as partial disarmament would only result in serving another weapon.
That is why inclusiveness as the way to human peace and concord, though well known to the sages of the past, has not been taught to us, for it was not only unfeasible, but would have weakened the party spreading it.

Now that all humans are in contact, let us reconcile ourselves by sharing this message and let us replace submission to the weapon by public decision making (inclusive, universal), stopping all arms development and initiating disarmament, for weapons are only one for another, let us all cooperate now to transform swords into ploughshares.

No to weapons

It’s our time

Unfortunately the most important western cosmopolitan text, the Republic of Zenon of Citium, has been lost, but its impact was able to found Stoicism, the main philosophical school from the 2nd century BCE to the 3rd century CE, from the Iberian peninsula to India, or in the Roman Empire and Alexander’s Empire.
But the cosmopolitan proposal could not be carried out in an unknown and incommunicado world, so the Stoics derived this knowledge into a doctrine of virtue and finally derived it into Christianity.

(Plutarch, On the Fortune of Alexander (Magnus), 329A-B)

The much-admired Republic of Zeno, the first author of the Stoic sect, points only to this, that neither in cities nor in towns should we live under different laws from one another, but that we should regard all people in general as our countrymen and fellow citizens, observing one way of life and one kind of order, like a flock feeding with equal rights in one common pasture. This Zeno wrote, imagining, as in a dream, a certain scheme of civil order and the image of a philosophical community.

(Meditationes, Marcus Aurelius, Book IV, 4)

The reason that commands what is to be done and what is to be avoided is common to us. Since this is so, the law is also common to us and we are fellow citizens, we participate in the citizenship of the world, which is our city.

(Meditations, Book IX, 1)

The nature of the universe has made us reasonable creatures to one another, in order that we may do one another good.”

Discover our Blog

We elaborate on the proposal for human unity, its relation to the history of thought, the international political situation and reflect on and make proposals for the Congress of Human Unity.

Trêve olympique

Trêve olympique

À l'attention de: Son Excellence M. António Guterres, Secrétaire général de l'ONU Son Excellence M. Dennis Francis, Président de l'AGNU Son Excellence M. Thomas Bach, président du CIO   Objet : Lettre de soutien et de demande de la Trêve olympique Chers...

read more
Letter in Support and Demand of the Olympic Truce

Letter in Support and Demand of the Olympic Truce

To the attention of: His Excellency Mr. António Guterres, Secretary-General of the UN His Excellency Mr. Dennis Francis, President of the UNGA His Excellency Mr. Thomas Bach, IOC President Subject: Letter in Support and Demand of the Olympic Truce Dear Sirs, We humbly...

read more
RECONCILIATION CALL

RECONCILIATION CALL

It is crucial to use our intelligence to understand and recognize what our humanity means, which does not allow for a 'partial or limited peace,' and that is why war is said to be 'absolute.' In the past, human groups were isolated and uncommunicated, and the...

read more